Examination of the Main Issues of the Euthanasia Debate...

Examination of the Main Issues of the Euthanasia Debate Introduction Talk of suicide and euthanasia has long been the focus of media attention. Recently this debate has been furthermore justified with the advent of European clinics that specialise in professional mercy killings for the terminally ill and those suffering incurable pain. To add to this, suicide rates in this country are ever increasing, with this being one of the ten most common causes of death in the UK. More worrying is the increasingly high number of adolescent youth and young men, who being particularly prone to depression, take their own lives. With the fact that it is still deemed as morally wrong, it must be†¦show more content†¦One way in which we can all look into these issues is to imagine the situation happening within our lives. How would you feel given the option of life or death? If life is intolerable and you see the suffering on family and friends, what decision would you like to make? Should politicians, who have no personal interest, be able to decide our fate? The term euthanasia means the intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit. (The key word here is intentional. If death is not intended, it is not an act of euthanasia). Voluntary euthanasia is when the person who is killed has requested to be killed. Non-voluntary: When the person who is killed made no request and gave no consent. Involuntary euthanasia: When the person who is killed made an expressed wish to the contrary. Assisted suicide: Someone provides an individual with the information, guidance, and means to take his or her own life with the intention that they will be used for this purpose. When it is a doctor who helps another person to kill themselves it is called physician assisted suicide. Euthanasia By Action: Intentionally causing a persons death by performing an action such as by giving a lethal injection. Euthanasia By Omission: Intentionally causing death by not providing necessary and ordinary (usual and custo mary) care or food and water.Show MoreRelatedActive Euthanasia: Physician Assisted Suicide is Wrong Essay1523 Words   |  7 PagesActive Euthanasia: Physician Assisted Suicide is Wrong The issue at hand is whether physician-assisted suicide should be legalized for patients who are terminally ill and/or enduring prolonged suffering. In this debate, the choice of terms is central. The most common term, euthanasia, comes from the Greek words meaning good death. Sidney Hook calls it voluntary euthanasia, and Daniel C. Maguire calls it death by choice, but John Leo calls it cozy little homicides. Eileen Doyle pointsRead MorePhysician Assisted Suicide : An Argument Of Semantics And Hypotheticals3266 Words   |  14 PagesJacqueline Aragon Drexel University Physician-Assisted Suicide: An Argument of Semantics and Hypotheticals Physician-assisted suicide is a prominent topic of discussion in the bioethical community. The main concerns of these discussions are the different types of euthanasia involved in physician-assisted suicide, as well as the legality of a physician’s right to aid in the death of a patient, and the patient’s right to choose death over life when there are no active treatments to forgoRead MoreLegalizing The Death With Dignity Act1905 Words   |  8 Pagescontroversial debate concerning the legality and ethicality of assisting in one’s death. When twenty-nine year old Maynard was diagnosed with neuroblastoma and given less than six months to live, she made the difficult decision to pick up and move to Portland, Oregon. Oregon exists as one of only four states that have legalized assisted suicide (Egan 60-64). In Oregon, she legally ended her battle with cancer in a dignified manner (Egan 60-64). The American Heritage Dictionary defines euthanasia as, â€Å"theRead MoreEuthanasia, a Sociological View3060 Words   |  13 PagesThe Euthanasia Debate, Related To The Thomas Theorem Topic: Euthanasia related to the Thomas Theorem Browser Used: Microsoft Explorer Search Engines Used: Google, Dogpile, MSN Search In The Unadjusted Girl W.I.Thomas wrote, Preliminary to any self-determined act of behavior there is always a stage of examination and deliberation which we may call the definition of the situation. And actually not only concrete acts are dependent on the definition of the situation, but gradually a whole life-policyRead MoreAruna Shanbaug Case - Supreme Court of India14522 Words   |  59 Pagescuriae, Mr. Pallav Sisodia, learned senior counsel for the Dean, KEM Hospital, Mumbai, and Mr. Chinmay Khaldkar, learned counsel for the State of Maharashtra. 2 2. Euthanasia is one of the most perplexing issues which the courts and legislatures all over the world are facing today. This Court, in this case, is facing the same issue, and we feel like a ship in an uncharted sea, seeking some guidance by the light thrown by the legislations and judicial pronouncements of foreign countries, as wellRead MoreJudaism s Views On Euthanasia2049 Words   |  9 Pagesof life, death, meaning and virtue, it is not shocking that, for countless people, religious convictions are the core reasoning for their outlook on euthanasia. Euthanasia is defined as the mode or act of inducing death painlessly or as a relief for pain. Although there are different components that play a part in a person’s stance on euthanasia, like empathy, suffering, constitutional rights, etc., this paper will concentrate on the religious aspects of the topic. Judaism and ChristianityRead MoreDeath with Dignity Essay4339 Words   |  18 Pagessuffer? There is a lot of controversy with the subject of euthanasia. I, for one, was not even aware of the depth of the subject until I started researching for this paper. It has been most enlightening and sometimes heart retching process to write this paper. There are actually 4 defined approaches to the method of euthanasia. Derek Humphries defines them in his book The Final Exit as the following: (Humphrey) 1. Passive euthanasia is the â€Å"pulling the plug† process. 2. Self-deliveranceRead MorePhysician Assisted Suicide Is A Universal Experience2194 Words   |  9 Pagesabout suffering and grief, and what we believe happens after we die vary based on our culture, religion, and spiritual beliefs. Spiritual beliefs ground our thinking about end-of-life concepts.† -Susan Thrane, MSN, RN, OCN Over the years voluntary euthanasia, also known as physician assisted suicide (PAS), has been a huge controversy in the United States as well as in other countries. Physician assisted suicide is defined as a doctor knowingly and intentionally with knowledge, means, or both requiredRead MorePHL 612: Philosophy of Law5882 Words   |  24 PagesDescription]: What is law? What makes something a legal norm? Should citizens always obey the law? What is the relationship between law and morality? This course will explore competing theories of law, such as natural law and positivism, and touch on crucial debates over civil disobedience, purposes of punishment, and interpretation of legal texts. It will deal with contemporary controversies over the legal regulation of human behaviour, for instance in matters of sexual morality. Grading Scheme: Course Evaluation:Read MoreCase Study : Boss, We ve Got A Problem Essay1901 Words   |  8 PagesDESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM The case study on â€Å"Boss, We’ve Got a Problem† presents a lot of ethical and moral situations, which need careful and analytical examination. The Summit village is faced with a huge problem, being that one of their best and most decorated and well-known people have been accused of child molestation. This comes as a shock to the people in authority and when it’s made public, most people a shocked because of the benevolence of the person being accused. Ethical problems are

King Philip Essays - 1709 Words

King Philip’s War was a disturbing war fought in America in 1675, almost certainly as a result of the early contact between the English Colonists and the Native Americans. The Natives were, and had always been fighting for their freedom and land, as well as their culture unharmed. Though the Natives had their own religious beliefs, the Colonists felt that they were the greater man, and that God would play a part by remaining on their side. The Natives did not trust the English with their multiple cheated promises and such, and it was only expected that the Natives would not believe in the English. There is no one established reason for this war, like many wars, but it is only probable that it be a result of the many differences between†¦show more content†¦Alexander died shortly after his reign from what is believed to have been an ill fever of some type. At this time, Metacomet, King Philip, would become the Grand Sachem of the Wampanoags. Philip was the predecessor of Tecumseh and was an excellent leader of the tribe. He knew that the English would try and rid them of their land and expand more until they wiped out his tribe totally. King Philip would need to get other tribes to understand what the English were doing, and to join him in the defense of their being. It wasn’t long until the English learned of this attempt at a possible revolt against them, and therefore in 1671, King Philip was forced to a southern area in Massachusetts known as Taunton. He was ordered to give up most of the firearms that the tribe possessed, but still kept a number of firearms within the Indians. Further, he signed an agreement with the Colony of Plymouth on September 29, 1671 that said his tribe would abide by colonial laws and guidelines with war affairs and Indian land. This was just another one of the Englishmen’s ways of stripping the Wampanoag’s of their power, but was probably only indeed signed by King Philip because he was under st rict enforcement, and it would give him a little breathing room with the English. Not forgetting about the tribes that King Philip attempted to have join them in their revolt against the English, the Naragansett, Nipmuc, and Pocumtuc tribes all gave their support to Philip and whatever heShow MoreRelatedKing Philip II Of Spain1631 Words   |  7 Pagesthat King Philip II of Spain was a great King and the idea of The Spanish Armada was a good idea that he had come up with. The Spanish Armada is about a boat that set sail in July 1588 by the Spanish, and it was ordered by the catholic King Philip II of Spain to invade England and take down the protestant Queen Elizabeth I. Queen Elizabeth I, was catholic but then became protestant. The Church did not like her decision and they wanted her to become catholic again, so the Pope encouraged King PhilipRead MoreJohn Philip Sausa: The March King Essay1008 Words   |  5 Pagessomething useful, I’ll teach him some music.† (10) John Esputa suggested to Antonio Sousa as his young son, John Philip Sousa, yearned for the opportunity to learn the ways of a musician. From a stubborn boy attempting to play the violin and trombone to the old man conducting his own talented band, deciding to learn music made John Philip Sousa the man who earned the grand title of The March King. The songs he wrote traveled word-wide, many pieces spreading across continents during the late 1800s tillRead MorePhilip The Fortunate Was A Very Good French King1011 Words   |  5 PagesPhilip VI the Fortunate Andrew Miller 10th History 12 - 27 - 16 Introduction I think Philip the Fortunate was a very good French King. He was known for being the first French king of the Valois dynasty. His reign saw the beginning of the Hundred Years War and the arrival of the Black Death. Body In May of 1328, Philip of Valois became King Philip VI of France. In August of that year, the count of Flanders appealed to Philip for help in putting down a revolt. The king responded by sending his knightsRead MoreKing Philip Regime and Government in Paris 1200 by John W. Baldwin1302 Words   |  5 PagesKing Philip Regime and Government In the novel, Paris 1200 by John W. Baldwin, King Philip (Philip Augustus), was an important contributor to the growth of the French Monarchy. He was able to increase the Monarchy better then any other King before him. He defeated many enemies, sought to overtake the British crown and embarked on a third crusade. King Philip Augustus brought financial stability to the country and was very popular amongst his subjects. King Philip when assigned King had many goalsRead MoreKing Philips War2143 Words   |  9 PagesAmerican History 19 October 2001 King Philips War: An Exercise In Failure In 1675, the Algonquian Indians rose up in fury against the Puritan Colonists, sparking a violent conflict that engulfed all of Southern New England. From this conflict ensued the most merciless and blood stricken war in American history, tearing flesh from the Puritan doctrine, revealing deep down the bright and incisive fact that anger and violence brings man to a Godless level when faced with the threat of pain andRead MoreSimilarities And Differences Of Philip II And King Philip I And Japan974 Words   |  4 Pagesabsolute ruler was Philip II who ruled Spain from 1527 to 1598. His religion was Roman Catholicism who felt it was his duty to defend Catholicism. Kim Jong Un is an absolute ruler of this time who began ruling in 2010 in North Korea. Kim himself has no religion and discourages religion in North Korea. There are many differences and similarities between rulers Philip II and King Jong Un’s domestic and foreign policies, including religious conflict, trade, econom y, and war. Past ruler, Philip II ruled withRead MoreThe Pros And Cons Of King Philip II864 Words   |  4 PagesWas Philip II of Spain a successful absolute monarch during his rule? Many people believe he had what it took to be absolute monarch, but there were several constraints he faced as a ruler in Spain. Philip II was known for building one of the largest empires from creating effective domestic and foreign policies to gain leadership of his kingdom instead of the local authorities in charge, but he did face problems while ruling the kingdom. His addressed many of these policies, such as the policy againstRead MoreThe Spanish Armada Of King Philip II1413 Words   |  6 PagesIn 1588, King Philip II of Spain sent a fleet of one hundred and thirty ships to her majesty Elizabeth I’s England to ultimately eradicate Protestantism. His country, Spain, was fully Catholic, so being Protestant would have been considered an act of high treason. Already provoked by England’s their r eligious intent, he was pushed over the edge when they started pirating ships from the Spanish Netherlands (currently the Netherlands, formerly ruled by Spain) for goods. He sent over a mighty fleetRead MoreKing Philip s War Caused The Salem Witch Trials1694 Words   |  7 PagesKyle Soong Prof. Holmes History 120 12/2/15 King Philip’s War caused the Salem Witch Trials The war between the Wampanoag tribe and the English colonists, known as King Philip’s War, gave the puritans the mindset that the Natives were associated with witchcraft and worshipped the Devil. The puritans believed that the natives would try to invade and destroy their religious community. The belief remained even after the war has ended which leads to the Salem Witch Trials in 1692, which occurred inRead MoreBismark and German Terrority Expansion 1541 Words   |  6 Pagesas Bedford was married to Philip the Good’s Sister Anne, the family connection had been lost. Shortly after, in October 1435 Philip the Good signed the Treaty of Arras and alliance, which ended a long rivalry, with the Armagnac’s. It is clear Philip the Good benefitted from this deal. The Treaty of Arras resulted in some French lands being given to Philip the Good. In addition, he acquired greater power in these lands. As an extract from the Treaty of Arras tells us, Philip was not require d ‘to do

Homemade Education Argumentative Essay Example For Students

Homemade Education Argumentative Essay Malcolm X describes how his life in prison changed his outlook on his any many peoples lives. While in prison, Malcolm X taught himself from dictionaries and books how to become literate. This literacy prompted Malcolm X to find an interest in history, but not Just history. The history white men left out. He became further interested in this topic, and found himself dig deeper and deeper. HIS Interest was never slowed, even years later, and e gives all the credit to the homemade education he gave himself in prison. Analysis: Malcolm X separates this story Into 3 separate portions, that all seem to play off each other. He begins with how he taught himself to read and write in prison by using tablets and a dictionary and wrote from every night. This part was Important, because as he states; he doesnt, think anybody ever got more out of going to prison than he did (203). In the next part Malcolm X begins to explain how he became interested In the part of history that white men left out. The history of minorities interests him greatly, and he begins to read more and more to fully understand these topics. He talks about some of these happenings In history, and his strong feelings about them. The last part of his story is Malcolm X reflecting back on how much he owed to his time in prison, and exactly what that gave him. He states, l have often reflected upon the new vistas that reading opened to me (202). He also calls books his alma mater, showing how he owes everything he knows to those books.

Reign of Terror Essay Example

Reign of Terror Essay The Reign of Terror: Was It Justified? The Reign of Terror started in 1789 and was a time when supporters of the French Revolution ran wild and started killing non-supporters or counterrevolutionaries. The French held a ceremony if you will, in Paris for the execution of King Louis XVI on January 21, 1793. This was because Louis was having financial, and harvest issues. In June of 1789 King Louis called the Estates Meeting to discuss taxes and money problems. Then some men disliked what Louis was talking about so they stormed out and filed into a tennis court, and vowed not to leave until they created a new onstitution. On August 26 The Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen was signed and put into action. Not everyone was in favor of this new constitution though. Neighboring countries and the catholic church disliked it because they feared a spread of a revolution and they lost power/property. To deal with their opposition of the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen they wanted to become more radical. They were led by chief-prosecutor Robespierre, who found King Louis XVI guilty of crimes against state/treason, and was executed (Doc A), therefore connecting all of hese events. Although it helped the government by getting rid of Louis WI, The Reign of Terror was unjustified because it took away freedom of speech, religion, and killed thousands of people. The Reign of Terror completely took away your freedom of speech if you werent for Robespierre and the French Revolution. When Robespierre took over and created the Committee of Public Safety, he laid down the law, and hard. Robespierre and the National Convention created watch committees in every neighborhood to expel any foreigners suspected of counterrevolutionary activities (Doc E). We will write a custom essay sample on Reign of Terror specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Reign of Terror specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Reign of Terror specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer The whole purpose of this was to protect the public safety when really even if they were counterrevolutionaries they probably wouldnt speak out because they would get their head chopped off anyway. So if you were suspected, whether you were guilty or innocent, your head was violently chopped off in the town square. All of this happened because people opposed the new French Constitution and they wanted to be more radical. Since King Louis XVI and his wife Queen Marie Antoinette had their heads chopped off, there wasnt anybody to rule the country of France anyway (Doc F). The National Convention was so strict they killed 35,000 to 40,000 people (Doc E). These were people who spoke out or suspected of not being for the revolution. This was a completely different view than the French Constitution. The French Constitution wasnt radical in anyway and believed in natural right and law. During the Reign of Terror in 1793 a revolutionary campaign was set to launch against the Catholic Church. Sunday Worship, Christmas, and Easter were abolished (Doc C). They sent government officials in Auxerre, France to the Catholic church and take things away from it (Doc C). During this when the government officials took it out on a cart they ottered tor passers-by to spit on it. In this time peri od the ruler Robespierre was a pro-atheist. He enforced this the same way he did with anything else; with an iron fist and strict consequences if you didnt oblige. This contradicts the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen and especially John Locke an English philosopher who believed in natural law and the right to defend life, health, and liberty. Locke believed in religious tolerance and Robespierre believes in being an atheist and if you didnt follow him, you dont deserve to live. This right that Robespierre took away struck the loudest uproar of anything else by far. People in the Vend? ©e region revolted against a military called lev? ©e en masse that sought to abolish Christianity in France (Doc C). An estimated 80,000 to 500,000 French people died on both sides (Doc C). Robespierre was responsible for all of these deaths by taking away the right of religion which is the right that most people demand and cant live without. The radical views of Robespierre cost thousands of peoples lives. He ordered the death of 45,000 to 50,000 throughout all of the Reign of Terror. Nothing compared to the lev? ©e en masse deaths by people Just fghting for their right to worship God. In October 1793, Revolutionaries decided to reenact an example of counterrevolutionaries in Lyons. One day, revolutionaries destroyed 1600 homes and chopped off 12 heads Just in 5 minutes. Robespierre is sending his revolutionary followers basically Just to torture people and take away their rights. The people the revolutionaries were members of the aristocracy, priests, farmers, and townspeople especially. He killed them because he thought they werent in support of the French Revolution, they didnt support him, or they supported the Catholic Church. By August of 1793, people were fed up of Robespierre and his radical ways so they started revolting against him. 3,000 national guardsman were sent to establish order and peace in Niort, France (Doc D). Even this wasnt enough as a government official had to ask the National Convention for more troops and assistance in calming down the fired up counterrevolutionaries (Doc D). Finally in July of 1794 the French counterrevolutionaries got what they had wanted for over a year; Robespierre is xecuted, his policies are demolished, and the Reign of Terror ends (Doc A). Although it helped the government by getting rid of Louis WI, The Reign of Terror was unjustified because it took away freedom of speech, religion, and killed thousands of people. The Reign of Terror completely took away your freedom of speech if you werent for Robespierre and the French Revolution. If you spoke out as a counterrevolutionary or were merely suspected, well you no longer had a head. During the time under Robespierre the revolutionaries set out to launch an attack against the Catholic Church. They demolished Sunday Worship, Christmas, and Easter. If you supported Christianity you were guillotined. Government official came into churches and took their things and allowed people passing by to spit on them. Also the radical views of Robespierre took away many peoples lives. Innocent people, and people Just fghting for their natural rights such as religion, and liberty. He was responsible for at least 100,000 deaths whether they were directly or indirectly. The Reign of Terror isnt Justified in any way when it causes many people to revolt and get killed for fighting for natural rights.

TOK Blog for Articles Essay

TOK Blog for Articles Essay TOK Blog for Articles Essay The percentage of U.S. women overdosing on prescription painkillers has increased sharply in recent years, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Between 1999 and 2010, the proportion of deaths from painkiller overdose increased 400 percent among women, while rising 265 percent among men. â€Å"Prescription painkiller deaths have skyrocketed in women," Dr. Tom Frieden, director of the CDC, said at a news conference today (July 2). "Mothers, wives, sisters and daughters are dying of overdoses at rates we have never seen before," Frieden said. While men remain more likely to die of a prescription painkiller overdose, deaths among women have increased at a higher rate, and are catching up to those of men, Frieden said. In 2010, more than 6,600 women died from prescription painkiller overdose, which is four times the number of women who died from cocaine and heroin overdoses combined, the CDC says. Most of these deaths are accidental. The death rate was highest among women ages 45 to 54. There were also more than 200,000 emergency department visits for opioid abuse among women in that year. Research suggests women are more likely to experience chronic pain and migraines, and to be prescribed prescription painkillers than men, the CDC says. Women may also become dependent on the drugs more quickly than men, the agency said. Because women often weigh less than men, they may experience life-threatening events at lower doses of painkillers, Frieden said. Rates of death from prescription painkiller overdose have increased at the same time as prescriptions for the drugs have increased. "These are dangerous medications," Frieden said. "In many other situations,

Airplanes The Better Transportation Essay

Airplanes The Better Transportation Essay Airplanes: The Better Transportation Essay AIRPLANES: THE BETTER TRANSPORTATION In 2008 the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration researched accident statistics for the entire country. They found that accidents occurred with 1.27 fatalities per 100 million vehicles traveled. The National Transportation Board found only 20 accidents for U.S air carriers. No one died and only five people were seriously injured in 2008. Although they might be different ways to travel, both airplanes and cars can be expensive, have problems, and be comfortable. Both airplanes and cars can be expensive. For example, last year we traveled to Colorado by car. Every so often we stopped at a gas station to refuel. Since gas prices are going up, refueling your car can get expensive. For round-trip we ended up spending a little over 600 hundred dollars in gas. However, traveling by plane can seem cheaper. The plane won’t need to refuel because the tank holds more than that of a car. A ticket for one person ranges from 200-300 hundred dollars. Therefore, it really depends on the person of how much they would like to spend. Additionally, both airplanes and cars can have potential problems. When on the road you may experience some car trouble. On our way to Colorado, my uncle made a U-turn, but ended up hitting the curb. When we got off we’d seen that the tire had been popped. While driving your car may just break down. For airplanes, your flight might be delayed. You might find yourself stuck in traffic while driving to the airport. Though airplanes and cars can have problems, airplanes have fewer problems than oppose to a car. Finally,

Intellectual Property Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Intellectual Property - Essay Example It was argued that Topshop had infringed the rights of Rihanna and that consumers were misled into thinking that she had endorsed the use of her photograph on the T-shirt, and this might have led to enhanced commercial sales and consumer confusion, which in turn had damaged her reputation. This is because Topshop’s action may have represented a loss of control of Rihanna in the fashion industry.3 As a result, Rihanna filed a suit against Topshop for manufacturing and retailing T-shirts bearing her photograph without her authorisation. The judge hearing the case ruled in favour of Rihanna. In the United Kingdom, there is no personality right that prevents unfair exploitation, in cases where a party evokes a celebrity’s image.4 Therefore, in the United Kingdom, there is no general right that famous people or any person can enjoy and use to control the reproduction of their images. The law of passing off is used by celebrities to protect their image. However, they have to show that they have goodwill in their image. They also have to show that there has been a misrepresentation, leading to public deception. This was ruled out by Mr Justice Birss who said that consumers of this era have full awareness that music artists take part in merchandising and endorsement in fashion apparel. According to Mr Justice Birss, consumers may not want to purchase products which have been authorised by artists, but they will rather purchase products with pictures on them because they love the look of it.5 One of the key factors that persuaded Mr Justice Birss to pass a ruling in favour of Rihanna was that Topshop, the fashion retailer, had engaged in promotional efforts involving Rihanna. For instance, there was a competition, in which the entrants could win a personal shopping appointment with Rihanna in 2010.6 Also, Topshop sold the T-shirt two weeks after there had been