TOK Blog for Articles Essay

TOK Blog for Articles Essay TOK Blog for Articles Essay The percentage of U.S. women overdosing on prescription painkillers has increased sharply in recent years, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Between 1999 and 2010, the proportion of deaths from painkiller overdose increased 400 percent among women, while rising 265 percent among men. â€Å"Prescription painkiller deaths have skyrocketed in women," Dr. Tom Frieden, director of the CDC, said at a news conference today (July 2). "Mothers, wives, sisters and daughters are dying of overdoses at rates we have never seen before," Frieden said. While men remain more likely to die of a prescription painkiller overdose, deaths among women have increased at a higher rate, and are catching up to those of men, Frieden said. In 2010, more than 6,600 women died from prescription painkiller overdose, which is four times the number of women who died from cocaine and heroin overdoses combined, the CDC says. Most of these deaths are accidental. The death rate was highest among women ages 45 to 54. There were also more than 200,000 emergency department visits for opioid abuse among women in that year. Research suggests women are more likely to experience chronic pain and migraines, and to be prescribed prescription painkillers than men, the CDC says. Women may also become dependent on the drugs more quickly than men, the agency said. Because women often weigh less than men, they may experience life-threatening events at lower doses of painkillers, Frieden said. Rates of death from prescription painkiller overdose have increased at the same time as prescriptions for the drugs have increased. "These are dangerous medications," Frieden said. "In many other situations,

Airplanes The Better Transportation Essay

Airplanes The Better Transportation Essay Airplanes: The Better Transportation Essay AIRPLANES: THE BETTER TRANSPORTATION In 2008 the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration researched accident statistics for the entire country. They found that accidents occurred with 1.27 fatalities per 100 million vehicles traveled. The National Transportation Board found only 20 accidents for U.S air carriers. No one died and only five people were seriously injured in 2008. Although they might be different ways to travel, both airplanes and cars can be expensive, have problems, and be comfortable. Both airplanes and cars can be expensive. For example, last year we traveled to Colorado by car. Every so often we stopped at a gas station to refuel. Since gas prices are going up, refueling your car can get expensive. For round-trip we ended up spending a little over 600 hundred dollars in gas. However, traveling by plane can seem cheaper. The plane won’t need to refuel because the tank holds more than that of a car. A ticket for one person ranges from 200-300 hundred dollars. Therefore, it really depends on the person of how much they would like to spend. Additionally, both airplanes and cars can have potential problems. When on the road you may experience some car trouble. On our way to Colorado, my uncle made a U-turn, but ended up hitting the curb. When we got off we’d seen that the tire had been popped. While driving your car may just break down. For airplanes, your flight might be delayed. You might find yourself stuck in traffic while driving to the airport. Though airplanes and cars can have problems, airplanes have fewer problems than oppose to a car. Finally,

Intellectual Property Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Intellectual Property - Essay Example It was argued that Topshop had infringed the rights of Rihanna and that consumers were misled into thinking that she had endorsed the use of her photograph on the T-shirt, and this might have led to enhanced commercial sales and consumer confusion, which in turn had damaged her reputation. This is because Topshop’s action may have represented a loss of control of Rihanna in the fashion industry.3 As a result, Rihanna filed a suit against Topshop for manufacturing and retailing T-shirts bearing her photograph without her authorisation. The judge hearing the case ruled in favour of Rihanna. In the United Kingdom, there is no personality right that prevents unfair exploitation, in cases where a party evokes a celebrity’s image.4 Therefore, in the United Kingdom, there is no general right that famous people or any person can enjoy and use to control the reproduction of their images. The law of passing off is used by celebrities to protect their image. However, they have to show that they have goodwill in their image. They also have to show that there has been a misrepresentation, leading to public deception. This was ruled out by Mr Justice Birss who said that consumers of this era have full awareness that music artists take part in merchandising and endorsement in fashion apparel. According to Mr Justice Birss, consumers may not want to purchase products which have been authorised by artists, but they will rather purchase products with pictures on them because they love the look of it.5 One of the key factors that persuaded Mr Justice Birss to pass a ruling in favour of Rihanna was that Topshop, the fashion retailer, had engaged in promotional efforts involving Rihanna. For instance, there was a competition, in which the entrants could win a personal shopping appointment with Rihanna in 2010.6 Also, Topshop sold the T-shirt two weeks after there had been